Weekly Commentary: Gradually Transitioning To Suddenly

2026-05-02 08:02:00 ET

Wednesday, in a six to three decision, the Supreme Court declared Louisiana’s SB8 district Congressional map unconstitutional. As has become commonplace, the Justices were split along ideological lines. Should we now expect similar ideological and political dynamics to take hold within the Warsh Fed?

Also on Wednesday, just a couple of miles west along Constitution Avenue in the Marriner S. Eccles Building, an FOMC decision to leave rates unchanged with a loosening bias meeting produced an eight to four decision. It was the first meeting with four dissents since the Greenspan Fed’s aggressive crisis-fighting easing cycle back in 1992.

May 1 – Reuters (Michael S. Derby): “Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland President Beth Hammack said Friday she ?dissented against the central bank holding on to ?an easing bias this week due to uncertainty around the economic and inflation outlooks. ‘Uncertainty around the economic outlook has increased in 2026 and makes the future path for monetary policy more uncertain,’ Hammack said… The official said she voted against ?the Fed’s policy ?statement… that left the interest rate target range unchanged… because it retained language that pointed to ‘a pause rather than an end to the easing cycle. I see this clear easing bias as no longer appropriate given the outlook.’ Hammack said ?there are now upside risks to inflation and downside risks to the job market. She added inflation pressures are ‘broad based’ and ‘and rising oil prices present an additional source of inflationary pressure.’ Hammack’s dissent took place amid an unusually fractious Federal ?Open Market Committee vote that saw four officials break from the consensus.” ...

Read the full article on Seeking Alpha

For further details see: